On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote: > 2013/12/11 Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> >>... Maybe a ResourceAccessVeto service, with a single vetoResourceAccess() >> method? >> > Yepp, thanks that was actually my initial idea (though I didn't bring it > across...) - we define this extra service for flags, but implementation > wise this is wrapped by a resource access gate to avoid complicating the > implementation...
Works for me, good idea - as long as implementors just have to provide a simple API they don't need to care how it's done under the hood. -Bertrand
