> The way that we get more "selling points" into it (if we need them), is to > stop releasing 8.x releases.
I tend to agree on this in general - I have been selective on what to backport for some time - let new features arrive in 9.0 and only backport to 8.9 if it's a bugfix or some code required for rolling upgrade to a 9.0 change. As I see it now, the upcoming 8.9 will be that last 8.x combined-lucene-solr feature release, as the Lucene PMC has already started 9.0 release preparations. So we should really not miss that 8.9 train for anything important for Solr 9.0. Jan > 28. apr. 2021 kl. 21:34 skrev Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>: > > Absent anything else, I want us to stop breaking whenever Lucene makes > an incompatible change reflected in a snapshot. Pinning to a 9.0 > release of theirs would give us that. Everything else is gravy. > > 9.0 will be built with Gradle, built after the split, there's already > a lot going into it. The way that we get more "selling points" into it > (if we need them), is to stop releasing 8.x releases. > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 1:39 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch > <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On v2 API, >> >> I did some review a while ago, though the goal was to compare its >> coverage with solrconfig.xml, rather than with V1. >> >> My discoveries (umbrella and children) are in SOLR-14795 . >> >> Regards, >> Alex. >> >> On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 12:04, Jan Høydahl <janhoy-apa...@cominvent.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We've come a long way since I last looked at the Roadmap WIKI page at >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Roadmap >>> >>> We have setup the Solr TLP, released a few new versions and landed some of >>> the major features for 9.0 >>> >>> Now is probably a good time to do some forward-thinking, preparing what >>> features need to land in 8.9 to make a smooth upgrade path for 9.0, and >>> what the 9.0 blockers are. >>> I've updated the Roadmap page by removing outdated content. Feel free to >>> edit it, perhaps remove stuff that is irrelevant or will not be done. >>> >>> Let's start 8.9 and 9.0 visionary release planning in this mail thread. >>> >>> Some of my questions are >>> * Will 9.0 have a working, tested alternative to Autoscaling API? Or are we >>> missing some pieces that should be 9.0 blockers? >>> * Will we deprecate v1 APIs? When? I see some v2 work done lately... >>> * Will 9.0 ship with some 1st party plugins or will we still ship all >>> contribs? >>> * What will be the main selling point for the Solr 9.0 release? Other than >>> "runs Lucene 9"? >>> * etc >>> >>> Jan >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
