I proposed this in the solr-pmc slack channel, but widening distribution here:
Are you up for a Solr committer's meeting? Main topic would be 9.0 prep / Roadmap. But could perhaps also touch use of lucene snapshots, reference branch, state of the deprecated features (autoscaling, cdcr, dih) and it is always nice to meet! Anyone volunteer to plan and host it? Jan > 29. apr. 2021 kl. 09:49 skrev Jan Høydahl <janhoy-apa...@cominvent.com>: > >> The way that we get more "selling points" into it (if we need them), is to >> stop releasing 8.x releases. > > I tend to agree on this in general - I have been selective on what to > backport for some time - let new features arrive in 9.0 and only backport to > 8.9 if it's a bugfix or some code required for rolling upgrade to a 9.0 > change. > > As I see it now, the upcoming 8.9 will be that last 8.x combined-lucene-solr > feature release, as the Lucene PMC has already started 9.0 release > preparations. > So we should really not miss that 8.9 train for anything important for Solr > 9.0. > > Jan > >> 28. apr. 2021 kl. 21:34 skrev Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>: >> >> Absent anything else, I want us to stop breaking whenever Lucene makes >> an incompatible change reflected in a snapshot. Pinning to a 9.0 >> release of theirs would give us that. Everything else is gravy. >> >> 9.0 will be built with Gradle, built after the split, there's already >> a lot going into it. The way that we get more "selling points" into it >> (if we need them), is to stop releasing 8.x releases. >> >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 1:39 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch >> <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On v2 API, >>> >>> I did some review a while ago, though the goal was to compare its >>> coverage with solrconfig.xml, rather than with V1. >>> >>> My discoveries (umbrella and children) are in SOLR-14795 . >>> >>> Regards, >>> Alex. >>> >>> On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 12:04, Jan Høydahl <janhoy-apa...@cominvent.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> We've come a long way since I last looked at the Roadmap WIKI page at >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Roadmap >>>> >>>> We have setup the Solr TLP, released a few new versions and landed some of >>>> the major features for 9.0 >>>> >>>> Now is probably a good time to do some forward-thinking, preparing what >>>> features need to land in 8.9 to make a smooth upgrade path for 9.0, and >>>> what the 9.0 blockers are. >>>> I've updated the Roadmap page by removing outdated content. Feel free to >>>> edit it, perhaps remove stuff that is irrelevant or will not be done. >>>> >>>> Let's start 8.9 and 9.0 visionary release planning in this mail thread. >>>> >>>> Some of my questions are >>>> * Will 9.0 have a working, tested alternative to Autoscaling API? Or are >>>> we missing some pieces that should be 9.0 blockers? >>>> * Will we deprecate v1 APIs? When? I see some v2 work done lately... >>>> * Will 9.0 ship with some 1st party plugins or will we still ship all >>>> contribs? >>>> * What will be the main selling point for the Solr 9.0 release? Other than >>>> "runs Lucene 9"? >>>> * etc >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
