> It was hoped SOLR-17112 would make 9.4.1 but it didn't as no PR was proposed.
> SOLR-17120 [is] nominated for inclusion in the 9.5.0 release Those both sound quick and reasonable; they've got a +1 from me to go into 9.5 (assuming the contributor decides to continue with SOLR-17112). > Considering Lucene 9.9.2 is being planned, I think it would be better to > upgrade Solr to the to-be-released version so users have to deal with > fewer upgrade cycles. Yeah, that might be best; I hadn't realized we weren't already on the latest Lucene 9.x. I've created SOLR-17128 to track our Lucene upgrade once 9.9.2 is available. Obviously this is a longer delay than some of the tickets above, and will mean we won't be cutting a Solr RC this week. We can pick a new date for the initial Solr 9.5 RC once Lucene 9.9.2 is available. Best, Jason On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 1:37 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: > Considering Lucene 9.9.2 is being planned, I think it would be better to > upgrade Solr to the to-be-released version so users have to deal with fewer > upgrade cycles. > > To highlight, there are about 90 odd changes in the Lucene 9.9.x line. > > -Anshum > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:47 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > FYI It was hoped SOLR-17112 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17112 "bin/solr script > > doesn't do ps properly on some systems" would make 9.4.1 but it didn't > > as no PR was proposed. There still isn't one but a contributor is > > thinking about it. > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:30 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ > > LONDON) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > > > > > > Just to cross-reference things further (Jason is already aware) -- > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17120 and > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2214 are nominated for inclusion in > > the 9.5 release, and as always additional reviews and inputs are welcome. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Christine > > > > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/22/24 17:30:35 UTCTo: > > dev@solr.apache.org > > > Subject: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0 > > > > > > NOTICE: > > > > > > Branch branch_9_5 has been cut and versions updated to 9.6 on the > stable > > > branch. > > > > > > Please observe the normal rules: > > > > > > * No new features may be committed to the branch. > > > * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be > > > committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches you > > > want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review > > > and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our > > > main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible. > > > * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be > committed > > > to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into > > > the current release branch. > > > * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as usual. > > > However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable branch > > > while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't the > > > addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the branch > > > may become more difficult. > > > * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.5 and priority "Blocker" will > delay > > > a release candidate build. > > > > > > The feature-freeze for the 9.5 release will go till the end of this > week > > - > > > I'll aim to create our first RC on Thursday, January 25th. > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > > > > -- > Anshum Gupta >
