Go ahead and backport on your own!  I'm still waiting on Lucene 9.9.2, so
there shouldn't be any branch-contention on my end.

Relatedly, Lucene has their RC1 out there and things look good a day or two
into their VOTE, so with any luck we'll be able to get a Solr 9.5 RC
together early next week!

Best,

Jason

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 8:49 AM Eric Pugh <ep...@apache.org> wrote:

> I am about to merge SOLR-17112, and will backport it to branch_9x.  Jason,
> do you backport it over to the branch_9_5 or do I?
>
> ERic
>
>
> On 2024/01/23 19:08:10 Jason Gerlowski wrote:
> > > It was hoped SOLR-17112 would make 9.4.1 but it didn't as no PR was
> > proposed.
> >
> > > SOLR-17120 [is] nominated for inclusion in the 9.5.0 release
> >
> > Those both sound quick and reasonable; they've got a +1 from me to go
> into
> > 9.5 (assuming the contributor decides to continue with SOLR-17112).
> >
> > > Considering Lucene 9.9.2 is being planned, I think it would be better
> to
> > > upgrade Solr to the to-be-released version so users have to deal with
> > > fewer upgrade cycles.
> >
> > Yeah, that might be best; I hadn't realized we weren't already on the
> > latest Lucene 9.x.  I've created SOLR-17128 to track our Lucene upgrade
> > once 9.9.2 is available.
> >
> > Obviously this is a longer delay than some of the tickets above, and will
> > mean we won't be cutting a Solr RC this week.  We can pick a new date for
> > the initial Solr 9.5 RC once Lucene 9.9.2 is available.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 1:37 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Considering Lucene 9.9.2 is being planned, I think it would be better
> to
> > > upgrade Solr to the to-be-released version so users have to deal with
> fewer
> > > upgrade cycles.
> > >
> > > To highlight, there are about 90 odd changes in the Lucene 9.9.x line.
> > >
> > > -Anshum
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:47 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > FYI It was hoped SOLR-17112
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17112 "bin/solr script
> > > > doesn't do ps properly on some systems" would make 9.4.1 but it
> didn't
> > > > as no PR was proposed.  There still isn't one but a contributor is
> > > > thinking about it.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:30 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> > > > LONDON) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Just to cross-reference things further (Jason is already aware) --
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17120 and
> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2214 are nominated for
> inclusion in
> > > > the 9.5 release, and as always additional reviews and inputs are
> welcome.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Christine
> > > > >
> > > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/22/24 17:30:35 UTCTo:
> > > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0
> > > > >
> > > > > NOTICE:
> > > > >
> > > > > Branch branch_9_5 has been cut and versions updated to 9.6 on the
> > > stable
> > > > > branch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please observe the normal rules:
> > > > >
> > > > > * No new features may be committed to the branch.
> > > > > * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be
> > > > >   committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches
> you
> > > > >   want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review
> > > > >   and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our
> > > > >   main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible.
> > > > > * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be
> > > committed
> > > > >   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then
> into
> > > > >   the current release branch.
> > > > > * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as
> usual.
> > > > >   However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable
> branch
> > > > >   while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't
> the
> > > > >   addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the
> branch
> > > > >   may become more difficult.
> > > > > * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.5 and priority "Blocker" will
> > > delay
> > > > >   a release candidate build.
> > > > >
> > > > > The feature-freeze for the 9.5 release will go till the end of this
> > > week
> > > > -
> > > > > I'll aim to create our first RC on Thursday, January 25th.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > >
> > > > > Jason
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Anshum Gupta
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to