Backport to branch_9_5 is done.
> On Jan 26, 2024, at 1:11 PM, Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Go ahead and backport on your own! I'm still waiting on Lucene 9.9.2, so > there shouldn't be any branch-contention on my end. > > Relatedly, Lucene has their RC1 out there and things look good a day or two > into their VOTE, so with any luck we'll be able to get a Solr 9.5 RC > together early next week! > > Best, > > Jason > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 8:49 AM Eric Pugh <ep...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I am about to merge SOLR-17112, and will backport it to branch_9x. Jason, >> do you backport it over to the branch_9_5 or do I? >> >> ERic >> >> >> On 2024/01/23 19:08:10 Jason Gerlowski wrote: >>>> It was hoped SOLR-17112 would make 9.4.1 but it didn't as no PR was >>> proposed. >>> >>>> SOLR-17120 [is] nominated for inclusion in the 9.5.0 release >>> >>> Those both sound quick and reasonable; they've got a +1 from me to go >> into >>> 9.5 (assuming the contributor decides to continue with SOLR-17112). >>> >>>> Considering Lucene 9.9.2 is being planned, I think it would be better >> to >>>> upgrade Solr to the to-be-released version so users have to deal with >>>> fewer upgrade cycles. >>> >>> Yeah, that might be best; I hadn't realized we weren't already on the >>> latest Lucene 9.x. I've created SOLR-17128 to track our Lucene upgrade >>> once 9.9.2 is available. >>> >>> Obviously this is a longer delay than some of the tickets above, and will >>> mean we won't be cutting a Solr RC this week. We can pick a new date for >>> the initial Solr 9.5 RC once Lucene 9.9.2 is available. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Jason >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 1:37 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Considering Lucene 9.9.2 is being planned, I think it would be better >> to >>>> upgrade Solr to the to-be-released version so users have to deal with >> fewer >>>> upgrade cycles. >>>> >>>> To highlight, there are about 90 odd changes in the Lucene 9.9.x line. >>>> >>>> -Anshum >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:47 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> FYI It was hoped SOLR-17112 >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17112 "bin/solr script >>>>> doesn't do ps properly on some systems" would make 9.4.1 but it >> didn't >>>>> as no PR was proposed. There still isn't one but a contributor is >>>>> thinking about it. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:30 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ >>>>> LONDON) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Just to cross-reference things further (Jason is already aware) -- >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17120 and >>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2214 are nominated for >> inclusion in >>>>> the 9.5 release, and as always additional reviews and inputs are >> welcome. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Christine >>>>>> >>>>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/22/24 17:30:35 UTCTo: >>>>> dev@solr.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0 >>>>>> >>>>>> NOTICE: >>>>>> >>>>>> Branch branch_9_5 has been cut and versions updated to 9.6 on the >>>> stable >>>>>> branch. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please observe the normal rules: >>>>>> >>>>>> * No new features may be committed to the branch. >>>>>> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be >>>>>> committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches >> you >>>>>> want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review >>>>>> and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our >>>>>> main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible. >>>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be >>>> committed >>>>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then >> into >>>>>> the current release branch. >>>>>> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as >> usual. >>>>>> However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable >> branch >>>>>> while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't >> the >>>>>> addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the >> branch >>>>>> may become more difficult. >>>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.5 and priority "Blocker" will >>>> delay >>>>>> a release candidate build. >>>>>> >>>>>> The feature-freeze for the 9.5 release will go till the end of this >>>> week >>>>> - >>>>>> I'll aim to create our first RC on Thursday, January 25th. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Jason >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Anshum Gupta >>>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> >> _______________________ Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such.
