Yeah, that was me. I am obviously happy to have Solr tested on as many architectures as possible. It's just a problem when the tests are much more likely failing because of underpowered hardware on the test runner. So in order to clean up our failing tests reporter, I thought it made sense to disable the s390x builds.
Would it be possible to get a more powerful test runner so that our tests are much less flaky on it? - Houston On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 12:38 PM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote: > There was a previous question about this on the mailing list a few days ago > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/5lzz0320n9v5ljnk1hwwplxpylqr1zbj > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 2:27 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I noticed that Apache Solr CI support for the s390x architecture has > been > > disabled recently > > > > I don't remember seeing this architecture before. Are you referring to > this > > architecture being used in ASF Jenkins for Apache Solr project? > > > > On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 at 10:25, Sudip Roy <sudip.r...@ibm.com.invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I noticed that Apache Solr CI support for the s390x architecture has > been > > > disabled recently. We rely on Apache Solr on s390x systems, and the > > removal > > > of CI coverage makes it more difficult to ensure ongoing compatibility > > and > > > catch regressions early. > > > I've raised a JIRA issue about this concern ( > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17807), and I was advised > > > there to ask on the solr-dev mailing list for more information. > > > We're happy to help if there's an opportunity to collaborate on > restoring > > > support for s390x. > > > Thanks in advance for your time and help. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Sudip Roy > > > > > >
