Yeah, that was me.

I am obviously happy to have Solr tested on as many architectures as
possible. It's just a problem when the tests are much more likely failing
because of underpowered hardware on the test runner. So in order to clean
up our failing tests reporter, I thought it made sense to disable the s390x
builds.

Would it be possible to get a more powerful test runner so that our tests
are much less flaky on it?

- Houston

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 12:38 PM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote:

> There was a previous question about this on the mailing list a few days ago
> - https://lists.apache.org/thread/5lzz0320n9v5ljnk1hwwplxpylqr1zbj
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 2:27 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > I noticed that Apache Solr CI support for the s390x architecture has
> been
> > disabled recently
> >
> > I don't remember seeing this architecture before. Are you referring to
> this
> > architecture being used in ASF Jenkins for Apache Solr project?
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 at 10:25, Sudip Roy <sudip.r...@ibm.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I noticed that Apache Solr CI support for the s390x architecture has
> been
> > > disabled recently. We rely on Apache Solr on s390x systems, and the
> > removal
> > > of CI coverage makes it more difficult to ensure ongoing compatibility
> > and
> > > catch regressions early.
> > > I've raised a JIRA issue about this concern (
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17807), and I was advised
> > > there to ask on the solr-dev mailing list for more information.
> > > We're happy to help if there's an opportunity to collaborate on
> restoring
> > > support for s390x.
> > > Thanks in advance for your time and help.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Sudip Roy
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to