It would also be quite reasonable that we modify our build to easily exclude Docker tests like these, in spite of Docker being available. CC @Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 1:20 AM Sudip Roy via dev <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for informing us. > We’ve been looking into the Tika-related test failures on s390x. > It appears that the Apache Tika does not yet provide support for s390x, > which looks to be the root cause of the failures we are seeing in Apache > Solr tests. > Our team is actively working on addressing this gap, and we’ll share > updates as soon as we have progress. > > Regards, > Sudip Roy > > ________________________________ > From: David Smiley <[email protected]> > Sent: 01 December 2025 11:43 > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inquire About Recent Disabling of s390x CI in > Apache Solr > > So far so good except the Docker based tests for our use of Tika (recently > added, by the way), are unhappy: > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Test-main-s390x/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 11:30 AM Sudip Roy <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Thank you for the detailed information. > > > > Regarding the parallel tests, would it be possible to reduce the number > of > > parallel test executions on the runners to see if that helps? > > Please let us know if there's anything we can do to support. We're more > > than happy to assist with anything needed on our side. > > > > Regards, > > Sudip Roy > > ________________________________ > > From: David Smiley <[email protected]> > > Sent: 26 August 2025 09:33 > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inquire About Recent Disabling of s390x CI in > > Apache Solr > > > > I don't think we know how to answer that other than to say -- similar to > > other machines. Which is no special hardware, really. I'm skeptical > > replacing the machine with a faster one actually solves anything > > fundamentally. > > > > I suspect that the real underlying problem is flakiness in Solr that > > triggers in scenarios when Solr is running slowly for whatever reason, > > which could be doing too much work in parallel (like too many tests in > > parallel). Maybe we could simply configure that build to use fewer test > > runners. > > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 10:38 AM Sudip Roy <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Could you please share the system specifications required for the tests > > to > > > run smoothly on s390x? We are working on providing new hardware. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Sudip Roy > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Sudip Roy <[email protected]> > > > Sent: 23 July 2025 12:16 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Inquire About Recent Disabling of s390x CI in Apache Solr > > > > > > Hi Houston, > > > > > > Thanks for the clarification. Totally understand the concern around > flaky > > > tests due to hardware limitations. > > > We can look into upgrading the hardware for the s390x runners to better > > > support the test suite. Could you please share the kind of > configuration > > > that will be needed? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Sudip Roy > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Houston Putman <[email protected]> > > > Sent: 23 July 2025 07:01 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Inquire About Recent Disabling of s390x CI in Apache Solr > > > > > > Yeah, that was me. > > > > > > I am obviously happy to have Solr tested on as many architectures as > > > possible. It's just a problem when the tests are much more likely > failing > > > because of underpowered hardware on the test runner. So in order to > clean > > > up our failing tests reporter, I thought it made sense to disable the > > s390x > > > builds. > > > > > > Would it be possible to get a more powerful test runner so that our > tests > > > are much less flaky on it? > > > > > > - Houston > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 12:38 PM Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > There was a previous question about this on the mailing list a few > > > > days ago > > > > - > > > > https://lists.apache.org/ > > > > > &d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHAuHSt > > > > > GQRY8YB0i8&m=_EQkWWBOawwWgF6Yhsg_NMTBa24rwkEPJg6-TP6kCwXUagedPf3_eiwGp > > > > M5dBxLF&s=uGXAmJvZxR4cqsyX1rWq5TBSTbvUOM8hKkzX8OploBY&e= > > > > > thread_5lzz0320n9v5ljnk1hwwplxpylqr1zbj&d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyT > > > > > cHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHAuHStGQRY8YB0i8&m=vwNQSnAJr8opb7WsL5 > > > > > _A66dYCzQNzWgxsZ6E_gx13k45UFR-yfe_ifZtIOO-Xr-A&s=GA_jY-Erfm8AHZbBxX_cv > > > > KKGxEi1e0nMPhsl36Y4Qnw&e= > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 2:27 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I noticed that Apache Solr CI support for the s390x architecture > > > > > > has > > > > been > > > > > disabled recently > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember seeing this architecture before. Are you referring > > > > > to > > > > this > > > > > architecture being used in ASF Jenkins for Apache Solr project? > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 at 10:25, Sudip Roy <[email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > I noticed that Apache Solr CI support for the s390x architecture > > > > > > has > > > > been > > > > > > disabled recently. We rely on Apache Solr on s390x systems, and > > > > > > the > > > > > removal > > > > > > of CI coverage makes it more difficult to ensure ongoing > > > > > > compatibility > > > > > and > > > > > > catch regressions early. > > > > > > I've raised a JIRA issue about this concern ( > > > > > > https://issues.apache > > > > > > > &d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHA > > > > > > > uHStGQRY8YB0i8&m=_EQkWWBOawwWgF6Yhsg_NMTBa24rwkEPJg6-TP6kCwXUagedP > > > > > > f3_eiwGpM5dBxLF&s=w9pAsho8IsjTGtic3OSqQ6kiUhQKs3qgjc7MhhZLun4&e= > > > > > > > > > > > > .org_jira_browse_SOLR-2D17807&d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHAuHStGQRY8YB0i8&m=vwNQSnAJr8opb7WsL5_A66dYCzQNzWgxsZ6E_gx13k45UFR-yfe_ifZtIOO-Xr-A&s=r2fm48wDw9SQmfm9J5m8-0deIZS8t0zpXk_YcgEUgV8&e= > > > ), and I was advised there to ask on the solr-dev mailing list for more > > > information. > > > > > > We're happy to help if there's an opportunity to collaborate on > > > > restoring > > > > > > support for s390x. > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your time and help. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Sudip Roy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional > > > commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >
