Hi Houston, Thanks for the clarification. Totally understand the concern around flaky tests due to hardware limitations. We can look into upgrading the hardware for the s390x runners to better support the test suite. Could you please share the kind of configuration that will be needed?
Regards, Sudip Roy -----Original Message----- From: Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> Sent: 23 July 2025 07:01 To: dev@solr.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inquire About Recent Disabling of s390x CI in Apache Solr Yeah, that was me. I am obviously happy to have Solr tested on as many architectures as possible. It's just a problem when the tests are much more likely failing because of underpowered hardware on the test runner. So in order to clean up our failing tests reporter, I thought it made sense to disable the s390x builds. Would it be possible to get a more powerful test runner so that our tests are much less flaky on it? - Houston On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 12:38 PM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote: > There was a previous question about this on the mailing list a few > days ago > - > https://lists.apache.org/ > thread_5lzz0320n9v5ljnk1hwwplxpylqr1zbj&d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyT > cHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHAuHStGQRY8YB0i8&m=vwNQSnAJr8opb7WsL5 > _A66dYCzQNzWgxsZ6E_gx13k45UFR-yfe_ifZtIOO-Xr-A&s=GA_jY-Erfm8AHZbBxX_cv > KKGxEi1e0nMPhsl36Y4Qnw&e= > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 2:27 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I noticed that Apache Solr CI support for the s390x architecture > > > has > been > > disabled recently > > > > I don't remember seeing this architecture before. Are you referring > > to > this > > architecture being used in ASF Jenkins for Apache Solr project? > > > > On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 at 10:25, Sudip Roy <sudip.r...@ibm.com.invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I noticed that Apache Solr CI support for the s390x architecture > > > has > been > > > disabled recently. We rely on Apache Solr on s390x systems, and > > > the > > removal > > > of CI coverage makes it more difficult to ensure ongoing > > > compatibility > > and > > > catch regressions early. > > > I've raised a JIRA issue about this concern ( > > > https://issues.apache > > > .org_jira_browse_SOLR-2D17807&d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHAuHStGQRY8YB0i8&m=vwNQSnAJr8opb7WsL5_A66dYCzQNzWgxsZ6E_gx13k45UFR-yfe_ifZtIOO-Xr-A&s=r2fm48wDw9SQmfm9J5m8-0deIZS8t0zpXk_YcgEUgV8&e= > > > ), and I was advised there to ask on the solr-dev mailing list for more > > > information. > > > We're happy to help if there's an opportunity to collaborate on > restoring > > > support for s390x. > > > Thanks in advance for your time and help. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Sudip Roy > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
