Can’t you add a junit ignore rule/annotation for this test that triggers when on s390x, similar to what we have for some other tests that e.g. should not run on windows?
Jan Høydahl > 9. des. 2025 kl. 23:49 skrev David Smiley <[email protected]>: > > It would also be quite reasonable that we modify our build to easily > exclude Docker tests like these, in spite of Docker being available. CC @Jan > Høydahl <[email protected]> > >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 1:20 AM Sudip Roy via dev <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for informing us. >> We’ve been looking into the Tika-related test failures on s390x. >> It appears that the Apache Tika does not yet provide support for s390x, >> which looks to be the root cause of the failures we are seeing in Apache >> Solr tests. >> Our team is actively working on addressing this gap, and we’ll share >> updates as soon as we have progress. >> >> Regards, >> Sudip Roy >> >> ________________________________ >> From: David Smiley <[email protected]> >> Sent: 01 December 2025 11:43 >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inquire About Recent Disabling of s390x CI in >> Apache Solr >> >> So far so good except the Docker based tests for our use of Tika (recently >> added, by the way), are unhappy: >> >> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Test-main-s390x/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ >> >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 11:30 AM Sudip Roy <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thank you for the detailed information. >>> >>> Regarding the parallel tests, would it be possible to reduce the number >> of >>> parallel test executions on the runners to see if that helps? >>> Please let us know if there's anything we can do to support. We're more >>> than happy to assist with anything needed on our side. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Sudip Roy >>> ________________________________ >>> From: David Smiley <[email protected]> >>> Sent: 26 August 2025 09:33 >>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inquire About Recent Disabling of s390x CI in >>> Apache Solr >>> >>> I don't think we know how to answer that other than to say -- similar to >>> other machines. Which is no special hardware, really. I'm skeptical >>> replacing the machine with a faster one actually solves anything >>> fundamentally. >>> >>> I suspect that the real underlying problem is flakiness in Solr that >>> triggers in scenarios when Solr is running slowly for whatever reason, >>> which could be doing too much work in parallel (like too many tests in >>> parallel). Maybe we could simply configure that build to use fewer test >>> runners. >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 10:38 AM Sudip Roy <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Could you please share the system specifications required for the tests >>> to >>>> run smoothly on s390x? We are working on providing new hardware. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Sudip Roy >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Sudip Roy <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: 23 July 2025 12:16 >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: Inquire About Recent Disabling of s390x CI in Apache Solr >>>> >>>> Hi Houston, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the clarification. Totally understand the concern around >> flaky >>>> tests due to hardware limitations. >>>> We can look into upgrading the hardware for the s390x runners to better >>>> support the test suite. Could you please share the kind of >> configuration >>>> that will be needed? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Sudip Roy >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Houston Putman <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: 23 July 2025 07:01 >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: Inquire About Recent Disabling of s390x CI in Apache Solr >>>> >>>> Yeah, that was me. >>>> >>>> I am obviously happy to have Solr tested on as many architectures as >>>> possible. It's just a problem when the tests are much more likely >> failing >>>> because of underpowered hardware on the test runner. So in order to >> clean >>>> up our failing tests reporter, I thought it made sense to disable the >>> s390x >>>> builds. >>>> >>>> Would it be possible to get a more powerful test runner so that our >> tests >>>> are much less flaky on it? >>>> >>>> - Houston >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 12:38 PM Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> There was a previous question about this on the mailing list a few >>>>> days ago >>>>> - >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/ >>>>> >> &d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHAuHSt >>>>> >> GQRY8YB0i8&m=_EQkWWBOawwWgF6Yhsg_NMTBa24rwkEPJg6-TP6kCwXUagedPf3_eiwGp >>>>> M5dBxLF&s=uGXAmJvZxR4cqsyX1rWq5TBSTbvUOM8hKkzX8OploBY&e= >>>>> >> thread_5lzz0320n9v5ljnk1hwwplxpylqr1zbj&d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyT >>>>> >> cHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHAuHStGQRY8YB0i8&m=vwNQSnAJr8opb7WsL5 >>>>> >> _A66dYCzQNzWgxsZ6E_gx13k45UFR-yfe_ifZtIOO-Xr-A&s=GA_jY-Erfm8AHZbBxX_cv >>>>> KKGxEi1e0nMPhsl36Y4Qnw&e= >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 2:27 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> I noticed that Apache Solr CI support for the s390x architecture >>>>>>> has >>>>> been >>>>>> disabled recently >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't remember seeing this architecture before. Are you referring >>>>>> to >>>>> this >>>>>> architecture being used in ASF Jenkins for Apache Solr project? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 at 10:25, Sudip Roy <[email protected] >>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I noticed that Apache Solr CI support for the s390x architecture >>>>>>> has >>>>> been >>>>>>> disabled recently. We rely on Apache Solr on s390x systems, and >>>>>>> the >>>>>> removal >>>>>>> of CI coverage makes it more difficult to ensure ongoing >>>>>>> compatibility >>>>>> and >>>>>>> catch regressions early. >>>>>>> I've raised a JIRA issue about this concern ( >>>>>>> https://issues.apache >>>>>>> >> &d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHA >>>>>>> >> uHStGQRY8YB0i8&m=_EQkWWBOawwWgF6Yhsg_NMTBa24rwkEPJg6-TP6kCwXUagedP >>>>>>> f3_eiwGpM5dBxLF&s=w9pAsho8IsjTGtic3OSqQ6kiUhQKs3qgjc7MhhZLun4&e= >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> .org_jira_browse_SOLR-2D17807&d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHAuHStGQRY8YB0i8&m=vwNQSnAJr8opb7WsL5_A66dYCzQNzWgxsZ6E_gx13k45UFR-yfe_ifZtIOO-Xr-A&s=r2fm48wDw9SQmfm9J5m8-0deIZS8t0zpXk_YcgEUgV8&e= >>>> ), and I was advised there to ask on the solr-dev mailing list for more >>>> information. >>>>>>> We're happy to help if there's an opportunity to collaborate on >>>>> restoring >>>>>>> support for s390x. >>>>>>> Thanks in advance for your time and help. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Sudip Roy >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional >>>> commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
