Hello, Thanks for suggesting. We’ve submitted a PR to skip the ExtractingRequestHandlerTikaServerTest on s390x. You can check it out here: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3945
Please let us know if any further changes are needed. Regards, Sudip Roy On 2025/12/10 01:19:52 Jan Høydahl wrote: > Can’t you add a junit ignore rule/annotation for this test that triggers when > on s390x, similar to what we have for some other tests that e.g. should not > run on windows? > > Jan Høydahl > > > 9. des. 2025 kl. 23:49 skrev David Smiley <[email protected]>: > > > > It would also be quite reasonable that we modify our build to easily > > exclude Docker tests like these, in spite of Docker being available. CC @Jan > > Høydahl <[email protected]> > > > >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 1:20 AM Sudip Roy via dev <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Thanks for informing us. > >> We’ve been looking into the Tika-related test failures on s390x. > >> It appears that the Apache Tika does not yet provide support for s390x, > >> which looks to be the root cause of the failures we are seeing in Apache > >> Solr tests. > >> Our team is actively working on addressing this gap, and we’ll share > >> updates as soon as we have progress. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Sudip Roy > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> From: David Smiley <[email protected]> > >> Sent: 01 December 2025 11:43 > >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inquire About Recent Disabling of s390x CI in > >> Apache Solr > >> > >> So far so good except the Docker based tests for our use of Tika (recently > >> added, by the way), are unhappy: > >> > >> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Test-main-s390x/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 11:30 AM Sudip Roy <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Thank you for the detailed information. > >>> > >>> Regarding the parallel tests, would it be possible to reduce the number > >> of > >>> parallel test executions on the runners to see if that helps? > >>> Please let us know if there's anything we can do to support. We're more > >>> than happy to assist with anything needed on our side. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Sudip Roy > >>> ________________________________ > >>> From: David Smiley <[email protected]> > >>> Sent: 26 August 2025 09:33 > >>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > >>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inquire About Recent Disabling of s390x CI in > >>> Apache Solr > >>> > >>> I don't think we know how to answer that other than to say -- similar to > >>> other machines. Which is no special hardware, really. I'm skeptical > >>> replacing the machine with a faster one actually solves anything > >>> fundamentally. > >>> > >>> I suspect that the real underlying problem is flakiness in Solr that > >>> triggers in scenarios when Solr is running slowly for whatever reason, > >>> which could be doing too much work in parallel (like too many tests in > >>> parallel). Maybe we could simply configure that build to use fewer test > >>> runners. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 10:38 AM Sudip Roy <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Could you please share the system specifications required for the tests > >>> to > >>>> run smoothly on s390x? We are working on providing new hardware. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Sudip Roy > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Sudip Roy <[email protected]> > >>>> Sent: 23 July 2025 12:16 > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Subject: Re: Inquire About Recent Disabling of s390x CI in Apache Solr > >>>> > >>>> Hi Houston, > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for the clarification. Totally understand the concern around > >> flaky > >>>> tests due to hardware limitations. > >>>> We can look into upgrading the hardware for the s390x runners to better > >>>> support the test suite. Could you please share the kind of > >> configuration > >>>> that will be needed? > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Sudip Roy > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Houston Putman <[email protected]> > >>>> Sent: 23 July 2025 07:01 > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Subject: Re: Inquire About Recent Disabling of s390x CI in Apache Solr > >>>> > >>>> Yeah, that was me. > >>>> > >>>> I am obviously happy to have Solr tested on as many architectures as > >>>> possible. It's just a problem when the tests are much more likely > >> failing > >>>> because of underpowered hardware on the test runner. So in order to > >> clean > >>>> up our failing tests reporter, I thought it made sense to disable the > >>> s390x > >>>> builds. > >>>> > >>>> Would it be possible to get a more powerful test runner so that our > >> tests > >>>> are much less flaky on it? > >>>> > >>>> - Houston > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 12:38 PM Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> There was a previous question about this on the mailing list a few > >>>>> days ago > >>>>> - > >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/ > >>>>> > >> &d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHAuHSt > >>>>> > >> GQRY8YB0i8&m=_EQkWWBOawwWgF6Yhsg_NMTBa24rwkEPJg6-TP6kCwXUagedPf3_eiwGp > >>>>> M5dBxLF&s=uGXAmJvZxR4cqsyX1rWq5TBSTbvUOM8hKkzX8OploBY&e= > >>>>> > >> thread_5lzz0320n9v5ljnk1hwwplxpylqr1zbj&d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyT > >>>>> > >> cHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHAuHStGQRY8YB0i8&m=vwNQSnAJr8opb7WsL5 > >>>>> > >> _A66dYCzQNzWgxsZ6E_gx13k45UFR-yfe_ifZtIOO-Xr-A&s=GA_jY-Erfm8AHZbBxX_cv > >>>>> KKGxEi1e0nMPhsl36Y4Qnw&e= > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 2:27 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>> I noticed that Apache Solr CI support for the s390x architecture > >>>>>>> has > >>>>> been > >>>>>> disabled recently > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I don't remember seeing this architecture before. Are you referring > >>>>>> to > >>>>> this > >>>>>> architecture being used in ASF Jenkins for Apache Solr project? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 at 10:25, Sudip Roy <[email protected] > >>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I noticed that Apache Solr CI support for the s390x architecture > >>>>>>> has > >>>>> been > >>>>>>> disabled recently. We rely on Apache Solr on s390x systems, and > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>> removal > >>>>>>> of CI coverage makes it more difficult to ensure ongoing > >>>>>>> compatibility > >>>>>> and > >>>>>>> catch regressions early. > >>>>>>> I've raised a JIRA issue about this concern ( > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache > >>>>>>> > >> &d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHA > >>>>>>> > >> uHStGQRY8YB0i8&m=_EQkWWBOawwWgF6Yhsg_NMTBa24rwkEPJg6-TP6kCwXUagedP > >>>>>>> f3_eiwGpM5dBxLF&s=w9pAsho8IsjTGtic3OSqQ6kiUhQKs3qgjc7MhhZLun4&e= > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> .org_jira_browse_SOLR-2D17807&d=DwIFaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=89rAlzwEGrdOvdu8CVs_Po_VWALHAuHStGQRY8YB0i8&m=vwNQSnAJr8opb7WsL5_A66dYCzQNzWgxsZ6E_gx13k45UFR-yfe_ifZtIOO-Xr-A&s=r2fm48wDw9SQmfm9J5m8-0deIZS8t0zpXk_YcgEUgV8&e= > >>>> ), and I was advised there to ask on the solr-dev mailing list for more > >>>> information. > >>>>>>> We're happy to help if there's an opportunity to collaborate on > >>>>> restoring > >>>>>>> support for s390x. > >>>>>>> Thanks in advance for your time and help. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> Sudip Roy > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional > >>>> commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
