+1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers, compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC table) well.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM Ryan Blue <b...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (not binding) > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue <b...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we >> have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for >> DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal. >> >> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans >> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d> >> . >> >> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to >> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote. >> >> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >> >> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP >> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . . >> >> Thanks for voting, everyone! >> >> -- >> Ryan Blue >> > > > -- > Ryan Blue >
