+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:41 PM John Zhuge <jzh...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers, >> compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and >> doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC table) well. >> >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM Ryan Blue <b...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 (not binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue <b...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think >>>> we have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations >>>> for DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal. >>>> >>>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans >>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d> >>>> . >>>> >>>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to >>>> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote. >>>> >>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>> >>>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP >>>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . . >>>> >>>> Thanks for voting, everyone! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ryan Blue >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ryan Blue >>> >>> -- >>> John Zhuge >>> >> -- --- Takeshi Yamamuro
