+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:32 AM Marco Gaido <marcogaid...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, 07:43 Takeshi Yamamuro, <linguin....@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:41 PM John Zhuge <jzh...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers, >>>> compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and >>>> doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC table) well. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM Ryan Blue <b...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (not binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue <b...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I >>>>>> think we have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write >>>>>> operations for DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal. >>>>>> >>>>>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to >>>>>> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>>> >>>>>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP >>>>>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . . >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for voting, everyone! >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ryan Blue >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ryan Blue >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> John Zhuge >>>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> --- >> Takeshi Yamamuro >> >
