+1 (non-binding) On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, 07:43 Takeshi Yamamuro, <linguin....@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:41 PM John Zhuge <jzh...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers, >>> compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and >>> doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC table) well. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM Ryan Blue <b...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (not binding) >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue <b...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think >>>>> we have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations >>>>> for DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal. >>>>> >>>>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans >>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to >>>>> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote. >>>>> >>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>> >>>>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP >>>>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . . >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for voting, everyone! >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ryan Blue >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ryan Blue >>>> >>>> -- >>>> John Zhuge >>>> >>> > > -- > --- > Takeshi Yamamuro >
