+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers, > compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and > doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC table) well. > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM Ryan Blue <b...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (not binding) >> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue <b...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think >>> we have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations >>> for DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal. >>> >>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans >>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d> >>> . >>> >>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to >>> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote. >>> >>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>> >>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP >>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . . >>> >>> Thanks for voting, everyone! >>> >>> -- >>> Ryan Blue >>> >> >> >> -- >> Ryan Blue >> >> -- >> John Zhuge >> >