I don't actually "lead" this. But I don't think this needs to target a specific Spark version given it should not have any user facing consequences?
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 3:36 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> wrote: > Thank you for leading this, Vladimir, Reynold, Herman. > > I'm wondering if this is really achievable goal for Apache Spark 4.0.0. > > If it's expected that we are unable to deliver it, shall we postpone this > vote until 4.1.0 planning? > > Anyway, since SPARK-49834 has a target version 4.0.0 explicitly, > > -1 from my side. > > Thanks, > Dongjoon. > > > On 2024/09/30 17:51:24 Herman van Hovell wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 8:29 AM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com.invalid > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:47 AM Vladimir Golubev <vvdr....@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> I’d like to start a vote for a single-pass Analyzer for the Catalyst > > >> project. This project will introduce a new analysis framework to the > > >> Catalyst, which will eventually replace the fixed-point one. > > >> > > >> Please refer to the SPIP jira: > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834 > > >> > > >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal > > >> [ ] +0 > > >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> > > >> Vladimir > > >> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > >
