+1 in support of the direction of the Single-pass Analyzer for Catalyst. I think we should not have a target version for the new Catalyst SPARK-49834 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834>. It should not be a blocker for Spark 4.0. When implementing the new analyzer, the code changes must not affect users of the existing analyzer to avoid any user-facing impacts.
Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com.invalid> 于2024年9月30日周一 15:39写道： > I don't actually "lead" this. But I don't think this needs to target a > specific Spark version given it should not have any user facing > consequences? > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 3:36 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Thank you for leading this, Vladimir, Reynold, Herman. >> >> I'm wondering if this is really achievable goal for Apache Spark 4.0.0. >> >> If it's expected that we are unable to deliver it, shall we postpone this >> vote until 4.1.0 planning? >> >> Anyway, since SPARK-49834 has a target version 4.0.0 explicitly, >> >> -1 from my side. >> >> Thanks, >> Dongjoon. >> >> >> On 2024/09/30 17:51:24 Herman van Hovell wrote: >> > +1 >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 8:29 AM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com.invalid >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:47 AM Vladimir Golubev <vvdr....@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi all, >> > >> >> > >> I’d like to start a vote for a single-pass Analyzer for the Catalyst >> > >> project. This project will introduce a new analysis framework to the >> > >> Catalyst, which will eventually replace the fixed-point one. >> > >> >> > >> Please refer to the SPIP jira: >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834 >> > >> >> > >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal >> > >> [ ] +0 >> > >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >> > >> >> > >> Thanks! >> > >> >> > >> Vladimir >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> >>
