Folks, thanks for voting! Yes, the target version was set by my mistake, Dongjoon. Sorry for that.
Vladimir. On Tue, Oct 1, 2024, 05:28 John Zhuge <jzh...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 7:42 PM Gengliang Wang > <gengliang.w...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:22 PM Jungtaek Lim < >> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding), promising proposal! >>> >>> 2024년 10월 1일 (화) 오전 8:04, Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org>님이 작성: >>> >>>> Thank you for the swift clarification, Reynold and Xiao. >>>> >>>> It seems that the Target Version was set mistakenly initially. >>>> >>>> I removed the `Target Version` from the SPIP JIRA. >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834 >>>> >>>> I'm switching my cast to +1 for this SPIP vote. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Dongjoon. >>>> >>>> On 2024/09/30 22:55:41 Xiao Li wrote: >>>> > +1 in support of the direction of the Single-pass Analyzer for >>>> Catalyst. >>>> > >>>> > I think we should not have a target version for the new Catalyst >>>> SPARK-49834 >>>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834>. It should not >>>> be a >>>> > blocker for Spark 4.0. When implementing the new analyzer, the code >>>> changes >>>> > must not affect users of the existing analyzer to avoid any >>>> user-facing >>>> > impacts. >>>> > >>>> > Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com.invalid> 于2024年9月30日周一 15:39写道： >>>> > >>>> > > I don't actually "lead" this. But I don't think this needs to >>>> target a >>>> > > specific Spark version given it should not have any user facing >>>> > > consequences? >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 3:36 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > >> Thank you for leading this, Vladimir, Reynold, Herman. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> I'm wondering if this is really achievable goal for Apache Spark >>>> 4.0.0. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> If it's expected that we are unable to deliver it, shall we >>>> postpone this >>>> > >> vote until 4.1.0 planning? >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Anyway, since SPARK-49834 has a target version 4.0.0 explicitly, >>>> > >> >>>> > >> -1 from my side. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Thanks, >>>> > >> Dongjoon. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> On 2024/09/30 17:51:24 Herman van Hovell wrote: >>>> > >> > +1 >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 8:29 AM Reynold Xin >>>> <r...@databricks.com.invalid >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > wrote: >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > > +1 >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:47 AM Vladimir Golubev < >>>> vvdr....@gmail.com> >>>> > >> > > wrote: >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > >> Hi all, >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> > >> I’d like to start a vote for a single-pass Analyzer for the >>>> Catalyst >>>> > >> > >> project. This project will introduce a new analysis framework >>>> to the >>>> > >> > >> Catalyst, which will eventually replace the fixed-point one. >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> > >> Please refer to the SPIP jira: >>>> > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834 >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> > >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal >>>> > >> > >> [ ] +0 >>>> > >> > >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> > >> Thanks! >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> > >> Vladimir >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>>> >>>> > > -- > John Zhuge >
