+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 7:42 PM Gengliang Wang <gengliang.w...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1 > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:22 PM Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding), promising proposal! >> >> 2024년 10월 1일 (화) 오전 8:04, Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org>님이 작성: >> >>> Thank you for the swift clarification, Reynold and Xiao. >>> >>> It seems that the Target Version was set mistakenly initially. >>> >>> I removed the `Target Version` from the SPIP JIRA. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834 >>> >>> I'm switching my cast to +1 for this SPIP vote. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Dongjoon. >>> >>> On 2024/09/30 22:55:41 Xiao Li wrote: >>> > +1 in support of the direction of the Single-pass Analyzer for >>> Catalyst. >>> > >>> > I think we should not have a target version for the new Catalyst >>> SPARK-49834 >>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834>. It should not be >>> a >>> > blocker for Spark 4.0. When implementing the new analyzer, the code >>> changes >>> > must not affect users of the existing analyzer to avoid any user-facing >>> > impacts. >>> > >>> > Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com.invalid> 于2024年9月30日周一 15:39写道： >>> > >>> > > I don't actually "lead" this. But I don't think this needs to target >>> a >>> > > specific Spark version given it should not have any user facing >>> > > consequences? >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 3:36 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> Thank you for leading this, Vladimir, Reynold, Herman. >>> > >> >>> > >> I'm wondering if this is really achievable goal for Apache Spark >>> 4.0.0. >>> > >> >>> > >> If it's expected that we are unable to deliver it, shall we >>> postpone this >>> > >> vote until 4.1.0 planning? >>> > >> >>> > >> Anyway, since SPARK-49834 has a target version 4.0.0 explicitly, >>> > >> >>> > >> -1 from my side. >>> > >> >>> > >> Thanks, >>> > >> Dongjoon. >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> On 2024/09/30 17:51:24 Herman van Hovell wrote: >>> > >> > +1 >>> > >> > >>> > >> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 8:29 AM Reynold Xin >>> <r...@databricks.com.invalid >>> > >> > >>> > >> > wrote: >>> > >> > >>> > >> > > +1 >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:47 AM Vladimir Golubev < >>> vvdr....@gmail.com> >>> > >> > > wrote: >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > >> Hi all, >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> I’d like to start a vote for a single-pass Analyzer for the >>> Catalyst >>> > >> > >> project. This project will introduce a new analysis framework >>> to the >>> > >> > >> Catalyst, which will eventually replace the fixed-point one. >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> Please refer to the SPIP jira: >>> > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834 >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal >>> > >> > >> [ ] +0 >>> > >> > >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> Thanks! >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> Vladimir >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>> >>> -- John Zhuge
