You mean we have committers who aren't running 1.5 yet? For shame. ;) I'll set up the "rough spots" page.
Bob On 4/18/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When a committer votes +1 on a release, it's taken to mean that the > committer is using the release in production his or herself, and that > he or she will support the release with patches and posts to the user > list. Technically, we only need three +1s to create a release, but we > like to think more than three committers will be available to support > a release. > > It doesn't matter what all the world is doing. What matters is what > the committers are doing with their own applications. We aren't > creating the framework just for other people to use. We are creating > the framework that we want to use with our own applications, and then > sharing the wealth with the general public. The Apache term is "We eat > our own dog food." Before we ask anyone else to put a release in to > production, we put it into production ourselves. So, the minimum > release platform has to match what the vast majority of committers are > now using in production. > > If the vast majority of committers are using 1.5, then 1.5 would be an > option. But that's the only argument that matters. We need the > committers to be using 1.5 at their own shops before we could consider > changing the release platform here. > > If someone were to setup that "rough spots" page, we could also > include a section where the committers could sign-up for 1.4 or 1.5 > support, based on what they are doing at work. > > -Ted. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
