> Jason brings up a great point. Is Struts2 meant to > be a "mostly" compatible upgrade from webwork 2.2.2, > or is it to be similar to the upgrade from Struts? > We have spoken about correcting the API, but I do > not think this question has ever been asked. I > think we have also been saying that if you want to > get a kickstart on Struts2, use webwork as their > will be only small changes - if this is not the > case we need to start setting expectations now.
Afaict, it was said that SAF2.0 would be a ww 2.2.2 with additional enhancements to make easy upgrades for 1.x possible ( a 'drop-in replacement' ). WW 2.2.2 users would only have to do a search & replace of the package names. I too expect(ed) an easy ww2.2.2 -> saf2.0 migration. If not, we should port over any bugfixes from the saf2 repository to the ww2 repository, for those who need ww2.2.2 fixes, but can't upgrade because the 'easy migration to saf2' turns out to be a bit more difficult that expected. > As far as the API is concerned, the only question I > have is do you think that the forField() and > forRequest() methods should be more generic? i.e. if > flash scope or workflow scope is added, additional > methods would be needed. Cheers, Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=29317&messageID=56962#56962 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
