On 5/5/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The current versioning/naming system will force them, because it does not make distinction between Classic and WebWork. Most users and/or their managers know that higher version number means newer and better product. Which is why I preferred "Classic" name for 1.x codebase. I think that before 2.0 and 1.3 are released, it is still possible to reconsider the names. That is, if 1.3 is still considered worth working on.
Evidentally, Don, Wendy, Martin, James, and I all feel that 1.3 is a worthwhile endeavor, since we all voted to support the Struts Action 1.3.2 beta release. A lot of work went into 1.3.x, and much of it happened long after 2.0 was announced. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
