You may want to take a peek at the svn source tree in t5. It has a slightly better version of these semantics. (though I doubt you'll find any advanced sort of expr support like ognl might provde)
That being said, 1ms or so is all it takes to render a lot of tapestry pages, so I wouldn't discount the potential perf savings that quickly.. Bob Lee wrote: > > I'm not sure I'd worry about it. Howard's post said it only made 1ms > difference. > > Bob > > On 12/12/06, dice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> The custom OGNLValueStack made little difference. AFAIK, the majority of >> the >> OGNL calls are dealing with the tag parameters in the tag templates which >> are not simple java properties. It's a pity. I was looking forward to >> using >> Struts 2 on our next major project but much like JSF it is too risky from >> a >> performance perspective. >> >> Back to Struts 1 ... *sigh* >> >> >> >> Bob Lee wrote: >> > >> > We noticed the same thing. Maybe we should replace it with JSP-EL? (I >> > don't >> > have time to rewrite OGNL myself.) >> > >> > In the mean time, we wrote a custom version of OgnlValueStack..... >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/OGNL-performance-detrimental-to-Struts-2-tf2804655.html#a7847866 >> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/OGNL-performance-detrimental-to-Struts-2-tf2804655.html#a7853159 Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
