I'm going to do more testing this week, but I think (fear?) I have a first opinion so far:
> [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ x] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) Especially, I think we're not at GA level, because I have already two concerns preventing me from seeing the required level of quality: - Today I filed WW-1711, which turned out to be a ducplicate of two already filed issues (and should now be fixed in SVN for 2.0.6). The issue is about select tag which does not show the already selected model value when form renders, if the model value is of any other type than String. I think this is something you can see as minor issue for a Beta release, but not for GA (I stumbled over it while doing a three view technology demo) - Regarding the discussion of doubled ServletRequestAware interface in api and core module, I can very much live with the general opinion that we don't need a GA quality api module so far - but I would like to see all classes and interfaces which users will most likely refer to to have proper naming and reside in proper package. IMO, at least for ServletRequestAware (maybe for others too) this is probably not the case - sooner or later org.apache.struts2.interceptor.ServletRequestAware has to be moved to org.apache.struts2.servlet.ServletRequestAware, if in a separated api module or simply in core module. But if we throw out a GA now, we commit on a certain api stability which I doubt we can guarantee in nearest future. So, before going GA, I'm +1 for reviewing most commonly used interfaces and classes to be at least stable regarding package naming and base contracts. If we would agree on this need, I would of course volunteer to participate in reviewing. - Rene Ted Husted schrieb: > The Struts 2.0.5 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-205.html > > Distribution: > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.5/ > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.5/m2-staging-repository/ > > If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with > a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > Please remember that a *binding* +1 for GA implies that you intend to > support the release by applying patches and responding to posts to the > user and dev lists. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > > -Ted. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
