I was hoping after 2.0.4 that the ognl race condition issue would have been resolved. Jesse is ready to push the release out probably this evening, but give it a couple of days. For me, 2.0.5 came a bit too soon after 2.0.4. But overal, I think the framework itself is ready for GA.
[ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [x] General Availability (GA)
Cheers, Phil On 2/6/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I disagree; you shouldn't vote beta just because you haven't ran the code in production. A beta vote should be reserved for the case where you don't believe the quality is at the level of a GA release, and there should be specific issues you can point to that you feel need to be resolved first. If you have downloaded the release, ran it through whatever tests you deem appropriate, and it passes with flying colors, then a GA vote is warranted. Don Ted Husted wrote: > Beta is also an option :) > > On 2/6/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> +0 for GA. I have some testing code that looks good, but no production >> code that has been converted. >> >> /Ian > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- iDTV System Engineer "Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live." - John F. Woods --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
