It's great that Tom is doing this work, and it wasn't my intent to put
down the effort. I guess I was just trying to preempt given some of the
OGNL threads.
/Ian
Tom Schneider wrote:
LOL, I didn't know my efforts were going to cause such a raucous. :)
Ted is correct--I started this on Saturday on a whim. At this point
it is completely experimental--we have a long ways to go before it is
even close to usable. However, I was able to execute a simple
expression using my value stack, which for me, was a worthwhile
accomplishment. I didn't want Don's work to abstract away the value
stack to be completely wasted, we needed at least one other value
stack implementation to truly test his changes. Don did good work,
but there is still a lot of OGNLisms that have crept into the code
over time. It would be nice to find and eliminate these
Ian brings up a good point in that we'll have to decide how to handle
some things like I18N/type conversion/method invocation. Not all EL's
are created equal and OGNL probably is a little more flexible and
powerful than most. Then even if we get all that working, what's the
migration strategy?
Tom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
