On Nov 6, 2007 3:00 PM, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For your comment, I am assuming you are saying the message is - changing > the EL means changing everything the EL touches, and selecting an EL > means making a choice on everything the EL touches, correct?
At this point, JUEL is just something Tom committed to the sandbox, like yesterday (literally). We aren't sending any messages to anyone else, since I doubt that many of us have had a chance to look at it ourselves yet. If JUEL turns out to be too much work, then none of us will use it ourselves, and it will simply wither away. The general idea is that we are building the framework that we want to use, and then sharing the wealth with others. But, Job 1 is that it has to be the framework that *we* want to use. Evidentially, Tom thinks he might want to use a framework that supports JUEL. The next question is whether anyone else feels the same way. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
