On 11/7/07, Tom Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ian brings up a good point in that we'll have to decide how to handle > some things like I18N/type conversion/method invocation. Not all EL's > are created equal and OGNL probably is a little more flexible and > powerful than most. Then even if we get all that working, what's the > migration strategy?
Type conversion isn't tied to OGNL in 2.1. XWork has a new API (copied from OGNL) to abstract type conversion. Of course not all EL's support type conversion in the same way, so there may be issues down the road. i18N isn't tied at all to OGNL, so I agree with Chris here as well. Even if the JUEL plugin works out, we probably won't be shipping it till Struts 2.2 at the earliest. I think it is awesome that Tom is working on it now, though, as I think it has a better future than OGNL, particularly for JSP users. Seam has shown you can build a solid framework on UEL and even extend it to add the new features you need. Don Don > Tom > > On 11/6/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2007 3:00 PM, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > For your comment, I am assuming you are saying the message is - changing > > > the EL means changing everything the EL touches, and selecting an EL > > > means making a choice on everything the EL touches, correct? > > > > At this point, JUEL is just something Tom committed to the sandbox, > > like yesterday (literally). We aren't sending any messages to anyone > > else, since I doubt that many of us have had a chance to look at it > > ourselves yet. > > > > If JUEL turns out to be too much work, then none of us will use it > > ourselves, and it will simply wither away. > > > > The general idea is that we are building the framework that we want to > > use, and then sharing the wealth with others. But, Job 1 is that it > > has to be the framework that *we* want to use. Evidentially, Tom > > thinks he might want to use a framework that supports JUEL. The next > > question is whether anyone else feels the same way. > > > > -Ted. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
