Chris Pratt wrote:
On Nov 6, 2007 11:35 AM, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry to be a little behind on the thread, but what is the message that
we are providing to user across different EL implements? Is accessing
internationalization text and using custom type converters, for example,
going to be the same for users for all EL's or different depending on
which EL is used under the covers?
Based on the two examples we have at the moment, they are different.
But I don't think it's necessarily the job of an Expression Language
to provide internationalization support.
No - but my question was what's our message to users. "If you change
EL's you have to update some/all the EL expressions as well as go
through and change the interfaces for type conversion, etc. - or - are
we going to try to abstract this a little for the user?
For your comment, I am assuming you are saying the message is - changing
the EL means changing everything the EL touches, and selecting an EL
means making a choice on everything the EL touches, correct?
It's purpose in life is
evaluating expressions.
(*Chris*)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
