>> The name of the "pristines-on-demand" branch implies a certain >> behavior -- namely, that pristines can, via some UI, be fetched on >> demand :-). [...] > >Just to offer a counterpoint Karl, I always assumed the goal of the >branch was to have no pristines in the WC and the "on-demand" aspect >was referring to an internal SVN detail that it would have to fetch >pristines when they were needed [...]
That name came, as far as I am aware, from Evgeny's branch which implements the latter. This may be a case where the public facing name for the feature ought to differ from the internal development name. Any ideas for a good public name? Pristines on Subversion's demand? Dehydrated WC? - Julian