>> The name of the "pristines-on-demand" branch implies a certain
>> behavior -- namely, that pristines can, via some UI, be fetched on
>> demand :-).  [...]
>
>Just to offer a counterpoint Karl, I always assumed the goal of the
>branch was to have no pristines in the WC and the "on-demand" aspect
>was referring to an internal SVN detail that it would have to fetch
>pristines when they were needed [...]

That name came, as far as I am aware, from Evgeny's branch which implements the 
latter.

This may be a case where the public facing name for the feature ought to differ 
from the internal development name.

Any ideas for a good public name?

Pristines on Subversion's demand?
Dehydrated WC? 

- Julian

Reply via email to