Il 12/12/2012 12:51, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto:
Like Christian, I'm +0 to this idea. In other words, I think it's probably
a good idea, but don't have strong feelings either way ;-)
The main advantage that I can see to doing this is that it may make core
development a bit easier, by not having to run the integration tests all
the time (incidentally: is there an easy way to skip the integration
tests?). Francesco, do you have any specific objections to this proposal,
or is it just that you are not convinced of the arguments in favour?
IMO it's not worth the hassle in arguing over this minor issue. If the
"pro" argument I mentioned above is not agreed by everyone, then I propose
we -1 this proposal and move on.
Colm.
My opinion is based on a basic question: which logic we want to follow
to divide the project's modules?
Syncope modules division is intuitive and it's based on architectural
components. And I prefer this logic. (Personal predilection)
Also because the only effort that would allow the creation of a specific
modul for the integration tests would be fastest building time (that as
Francesco says, is low because it's less than three minutes), on the
contrary we start a project fragmentation that make it less intuitive.
For me: -1
Massimiliano
--
Massimiliano Perrone
Tel +39 393 9121310
Tirasa S.r.l.
Viale D'Annunzio 267 - 65127 Pescara
Tel +39 0859116307 / FAX +39 0859111173
http://www.tirasa.net
Apache Syncope PMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~massi/
"L'apprendere molte cose non insegna l'intelligenza"
(Eraclito)
