On 19/02/2013 11:32, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 19/02/2013 11:28, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
When using the CSVDir 0.7-SNAPSHOT we would be forced to use ConnId
1.3.3-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.3.2.
Is there any reason why we can't just do that on trunk anyway? I assume
we're going to release Syncope 1.1 with ConnId 1.3.3 anyway?
Not sure: I think it heavily depends on when this ConnId 1.3.3 will be
available; personally, I will go with 1.3.2 for Syncope 1.1.0.
I should have said "I would go"... sorry.
Why not backporting your fix on 0.7-SNAPSHOT to 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT?
I will do.
Fine.
Regards.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <
[email protected]> wrote:
On 19/02/2013 11:13, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi all,
Following the query on the CSV SNAPSHOT in Syncope, just wondering
why are
we including 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT on trunk instead of 0.7-SNAPSHOT? The
former
does not include the fixes I made recently (in particular the
properties
file is in the wrong package name, and so the correct property keys
are
not
displayed in Syncope).
When using the CSVDir 0.7-SNAPSHOT we would be forced to use ConnId
1.3.3-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.3.2.
Why not backporting your fix on 0.7-SNAPSHOT to 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT?
Regards.
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~**ilgrosso/<http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/>
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
