Il giorno 19/feb/2013, alle ore 11.44, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto: >> >> Guys, I'd prefere to keep the 1.3.2 for Syncope 1.1.0. >> Since we are expecting to release soon I'd like to be sure about the >> reliability of the 1.1.0. > > > Why do you think 1.3.3 would be particularly unreliable? There have not > been many fixes made from what I can see. > > I don't have strong objections to using 1.3.2 for Syncope 1.1, however I > would like if the fixes I've made make it into Syncope for 1.1. I will > backport the CSV fixes to the branch. How about a new branch for the LDAP + > DB bundles that I can backport fixes to? In particular I would like to have > LDAP-2, LDAP-5 and LDAP-6 available in Syncope 1.1.
OK Colm, probably we can do the following. Since I'd like to maintain the possibility to switch from a newest connector version to an old one I'd ask you to verify before the possibility to run, for example, CsvDir 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT with the latest framework version. If I well remember this should be possible (the opposite is not possible for sure). This would be sufficient to have my +1. Best regards, F. > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Fabio Martelli > <fabio.marte...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> Il giorno 19/feb/2013, alle ore 11.28, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto: >> >>>> When using the CSVDir 0.7-SNAPSHOT we would be forced to use ConnId >>>> 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.3.2. >>>> >>> >>> Is there any reason why we can't just do that on trunk anyway? I assume >>> we're going to release Syncope 1.1 with ConnId 1.3.3 anyway? >> >> Guys, I'd prefere to keep the 1.3.2 for Syncope 1.1.0. >> Since we are expecting to release soon I'd like to be sure about the >> reliability of the 1.1.0. >> >> Regards, >> F. >> >>>> Why not backporting your fix on 0.7-SNAPSHOT to 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT? >>> I will do. >>> >>> Colm. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò < >>> ilgro...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 19/02/2013 11:13, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Following the query on the CSV SNAPSHOT in Syncope, just wondering why >> are >>>>> we including 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT on trunk instead of 0.7-SNAPSHOT? The >> former >>>>> does not include the fixes I made recently (in particular the >> properties >>>>> file is in the wrong package name, and so the correct property keys are >>>>> not >>>>> displayed in Syncope). >>>>> >>>> >>>> When using the CSVDir 0.7-SNAPSHOT we would be forced to use ConnId >>>> 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.3.2. >>>> >>>> Why not backporting your fix on 0.7-SNAPSHOT to 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT? >>>> >>>> Regards. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Francesco Chicchiriccò >>>> >>>> ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member >>>> http://people.apache.org/~**ilgrosso/< >> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Colm O hEigeartaigh >>> >>> Talend Community Coder >>> http://coders.talend.com >> >> > > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com
