Il giorno 19/feb/2013, alle ore 11.28, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto: >> When using the CSVDir 0.7-SNAPSHOT we would be forced to use ConnId >> 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.3.2. >> > > Is there any reason why we can't just do that on trunk anyway? I assume > we're going to release Syncope 1.1 with ConnId 1.3.3 anyway?
Guys, I'd prefere to keep the 1.3.2 for Syncope 1.1.0. Since we are expecting to release soon I'd like to be sure about the reliability of the 1.1.0. Regards, F. >> Why not backporting your fix on 0.7-SNAPSHOT to 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT? > I will do. > > Colm. > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 19/02/2013 11:13, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Following the query on the CSV SNAPSHOT in Syncope, just wondering why are >>> we including 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT on trunk instead of 0.7-SNAPSHOT? The former >>> does not include the fixes I made recently (in particular the properties >>> file is in the wrong package name, and so the correct property keys are >>> not >>> displayed in Syncope). >>> >> >> When using the CSVDir 0.7-SNAPSHOT we would be forced to use ConnId >> 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.3.2. >> >> Why not backporting your fix on 0.7-SNAPSHOT to 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT? >> >> Regards. >> >> -- >> Francesco Chicchiriccò >> >> ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member >> http://people.apache.org/~**ilgrosso/<http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/> >> >> > > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com
