Hi Fabio,
> OK Colm, probably we can do the following. > Since I'd like to maintain the possibility to switch from a newest > connector version to an old one I'd ask you to verify before the > possibility to run, for example, CsvDir 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT with the latest > framework version. > If I well remember this should be possible (the opposite is not possible > for sure). This would be sufficient to have my +1. Ok great, I will do this. Colm. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Fabio Martelli <fabio.marte...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Il giorno 19/feb/2013, alle ore 11.44, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto: > > >> > >> Guys, I'd prefere to keep the 1.3.2 for Syncope 1.1.0. > >> Since we are expecting to release soon I'd like to be sure about the > >> reliability of the 1.1.0. > > > > > > Why do you think 1.3.3 would be particularly unreliable? There have not > > been many fixes made from what I can see. > > > > I don't have strong objections to using 1.3.2 for Syncope 1.1, however I > > would like if the fixes I've made make it into Syncope for 1.1. I will > > backport the CSV fixes to the branch. How about a new branch for the > LDAP + > > DB bundles that I can backport fixes to? In particular I would like to > have > > LDAP-2, LDAP-5 and LDAP-6 available in Syncope 1.1. > > OK Colm, probably we can do the following. > Since I'd like to maintain the possibility to switch from a newest > connector version to an old one I'd ask you to verify before the > possibility to run, for example, CsvDir 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT with the latest > framework version. > If I well remember this should be possible (the opposite is not possible > for sure). This would be sufficient to have my +1. > > Best regards, > F. > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Fabio Martelli > > <fabio.marte...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> > >> Il giorno 19/feb/2013, alle ore 11.28, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto: > >> > >>>> When using the CSVDir 0.7-SNAPSHOT we would be forced to use ConnId > >>>> 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.3.2. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Is there any reason why we can't just do that on trunk anyway? I assume > >>> we're going to release Syncope 1.1 with ConnId 1.3.3 anyway? > >> > >> Guys, I'd prefere to keep the 1.3.2 for Syncope 1.1.0. > >> Since we are expecting to release soon I'd like to be sure about the > >> reliability of the 1.1.0. > >> > >> Regards, > >> F. > >> > >>>> Why not backporting your fix on 0.7-SNAPSHOT to 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT? > >>> I will do. > >>> > >>> Colm. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò < > >>> ilgro...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 19/02/2013 11:13, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> > >>>>> Following the query on the CSV SNAPSHOT in Syncope, just wondering > why > >> are > >>>>> we including 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT on trunk instead of 0.7-SNAPSHOT? The > >> former > >>>>> does not include the fixes I made recently (in particular the > >> properties > >>>>> file is in the wrong package name, and so the correct property keys > are > >>>>> not > >>>>> displayed in Syncope). > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> When using the CSVDir 0.7-SNAPSHOT we would be forced to use ConnId > >>>> 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.3.2. > >>>> > >>>> Why not backporting your fix on 0.7-SNAPSHOT to 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT? > >>>> > >>>> Regards. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Francesco Chicchiriccò > >>>> > >>>> ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~**ilgrosso/< > >> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Colm O hEigeartaigh > >>> > >>> Talend Community Coder > >>> http://coders.talend.com > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > > > Talend Community Coder > > http://coders.talend.com > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
