On 22/07/2013 12:45, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 22/07/2013 12:41, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
Hi all,
I have recently read a stunning post from Christian Grobmeier [1] and
I was thinking why not to switch the trunk (1.2.0) from logback to
log4j 2 (with new AsyncLoggers, of course!).
I was also thinking to keep the SLF4J layer, so that code changes
would be minimal.
Besides performance benefit, we will also increase our non-ASF
dependency level.
Ops, I was meaning "...we will also *decrease* our non-ASF dependency
level".
WDYT?
+1
[1]
http://www.grobmeier.de/log4j-2-performance-close-to-insane-20072013.html#.Ue0KLRe9hyc
--
Massimiliano Perrone
Tel +39 393 9121310
Tirasa S.r.l.
Viale D'Annunzio 267 - 65127 Pescara
Tel +39 0859116307 / FAX +39 0859111173
http://www.tirasa.net
Apache Syncope PMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~massi/
"L'apprendere molte cose non insegna l'intelligenza"
(Eraclito)
