Excellent idea! > -----Original Message----- > From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org] > Sent: Montag, 22. Juli 2013 12:42 > To: dev@syncope.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] Replace logback with log4j 2 > > Hi all, > I have recently read a stunning post from Christian Grobmeier [1] and I was > thinking why not to switch the trunk (1.2.0) from logback to log4j 2 (with new > AsyncLoggers, of course!). > I was also thinking to keep the SLF4J layer, so that code changes would be > minimal. > > Besides performance benefit, we will also increase our non-ASF dependency > level. > > WDYT?
+1 > > [1] > http://www.grobmeier.de/log4j-2-performance-close-to-insane- > 20072013.html#.Ue0KLRe9hyc > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
