+1. Colm.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò < ilgro...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > I have recently read a stunning post from Christian Grobmeier [1] and I > was thinking why not to switch the trunk (1.2.0) from logback to log4j 2 > (with new AsyncLoggers, of course!). > I was also thinking to keep the SLF4J layer, so that code changes would be > minimal. > > Besides performance benefit, we will also increase our non-ASF dependency > level. > > WDYT? > > [1] http://www.grobmeier.de/log4j-**2-performance-close-to-insane-** > 20072013.html#.Ue0KLRe9hyc<http://www.grobmeier.de/log4j-2-performance-close-to-insane-20072013.html#.Ue0KLRe9hyc> > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member > http://people.apache.org/~**ilgrosso/<http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/> > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
