+1.

Colm.


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <
ilgro...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I have recently read a stunning post from Christian Grobmeier [1] and I
> was thinking why not to switch the trunk (1.2.0) from logback to log4j 2
> (with new AsyncLoggers, of course!).
> I was also thinking to keep the SLF4J layer, so that code changes would be
> minimal.
>
> Besides performance benefit, we will also increase our non-ASF dependency
> level.
>
> WDYT?
>
> [1] http://www.grobmeier.de/log4j-**2-performance-close-to-insane-**
> 20072013.html#.Ue0KLRe9hyc<http://www.grobmeier.de/log4j-2-performance-close-to-insane-20072013.html#.Ue0KLRe9hyc>
>
> --
> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>
> ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
> http://people.apache.org/~**ilgrosso/<http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/>
>
>


-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to