Il 22/07/2013 12:50, Massimiliano Perrone ha scritto:
On 22/07/2013 12:45, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 22/07/2013 12:41, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
Hi all,
I have recently read a stunning post from Christian Grobmeier [1]
and I was thinking why not to switch the trunk (1.2.0) from logback
to log4j 2 (with new AsyncLoggers, of course!).
I was also thinking to keep the SLF4J layer, so that code changes
would be minimal.
Besides performance benefit, we will also increase our non-ASF
dependency level.
Ops, I was meaning "...we will also *decrease* our non-ASF dependency
level".
WDYT?
+1
[1]
http://www.grobmeier.de/log4j-2-performance-close-to-insane-20072013.html#.Ue0KLRe9hyc
+1
--
Dott. Andrea Patricelli
Tel +393204524292
Trainee @ Tirasa S.r.l.
Viale D'Annunzio 267 - 65127 Pescara
Tel +390859116307 / FAX +39 0859111173
http://www.tirasa.net
