no - we don't have one for the main web site. i've wanted to suggest that
we change that though and generate the main web site from the github repo.
in that way we could easily accept pull requests and such. i don't think we
want to take a full asciidoc approach and the web site generation would
probably stay separate from the doc generation, but it would be nice if we
could bin/generate-web-site.sh for a local build of that that thing which
could then be published to the apache svn repo. anyone else like that idea?
if so, how would it best be done?



On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Robert Dale <robd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there a git repo for this and the main website?  I would like to
> make pull requests to fix some things.
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The download page is now "live"
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I assume everyone is cool with making the Download Page live at this
> point
> >> as there's been no other feedback in the last few days. I'll probably
> make
> >> some adjustments to the web site tomorrow to bring it online publicly.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I updated the downloads page some more:
> >>>
> >>> + tweaked the date format a bit to "really" match the rest of the site
> >>> (which is still inconsistent in other places like changelog - dah)
> >>> + added a "verifying downloads" section which talks about GPG/PGP/etc.
> >>>
> >>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/downloads.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Mallette <
> spmalle...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Good feedback Robert/Jason.
> >>>>
> >>>> Updated:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/downloads.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Added documentation and included some descriptors to current releases.
> >>>> Didn't change the date format for now - that's the format we use
> everywhere
> >>>> around "release" so didn't want to muck with that at this point.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Robert Dale <robd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Stephen, I think what Sebb might be getting at is that some things
> >>>>> should be spelled out even if they are obvious to some. I agree with
> >>>>> this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 3.2.1 (latest, stable)
> >>>>> 3.1.3 (bug fixes only)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think the dates should be in ISO8601 format.  YYYY-MM-DD
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Otherwise, I think it looks very good.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Robert Dale
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Jason Plurad <plur...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > +1 looks great.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Link to the documentation, maybe next to the release notes link,
> >>>>> would be
> >>>>> > useful too.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > -- Jason
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stephen Mallette <
> >>>>> spmalle...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >> I think it might be a good idea to include a "Download Page" on
> our
> >>>>> web
> >>>>> >> site. It would let us better list the versions we have out there
> and
> >>>>> would
> >>>>> >> get us better in line with Apache Infrastructure - for example:
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1255
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> I'm also seeing that we yet have spots where we dont' link to the
> >>>>> mirror
> >>>>> >> system. And finally, it would be nice to have a "generic" download
> >>>>> page
> >>>>> >> where we could point external links to - like the new
> "documentation"
> >>>>> >> feature in StackOverflow (right now it's sorta hardcoded to the
> >>>>> mirror
> >>>>> >> which isn't so good because we'll have to change that all the
> time).
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> I quickly took a swipe at such a page:
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/downloads.html
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> It is NOT "linked to" by anything at this point so it is
> "hidden". I
> >>>>> just
> >>>>> >> wanted to have something that everyone could look at to get the
> idea
> >>>>> of
> >>>>> >> what such a page might look like.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Thoughts?
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Thanks,
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Stephen
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Robert Dale
>

Reply via email to