yes - static html/css and it sucks a bit because we don't have any re-use going on there. so if we have to change a menu or something it means changing it on every page in the site. would be nice to have some re-usable headers/footers and such. i looked into some static site generators a while back, but they all seemed like they did too much. maybe i didn't know what to look for.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Dylan Millikin <dylan.milli...@gmail.com> wrote: > How is the current site structured? Is it just HTML and CSS files? > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > no - we don't have one for the main web site. i've wanted to suggest that > > we change that though and generate the main web site from the github > repo. > > in that way we could easily accept pull requests and such. i don't think > we > > want to take a full asciidoc approach and the web site generation would > > probably stay separate from the doc generation, but it would be nice if > we > > could bin/generate-web-site.sh for a local build of that that thing which > > could then be published to the apache svn repo. anyone else like that > idea? > > if so, how would it best be done? > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Robert Dale <robd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Is there a git repo for this and the main website? I would like to > > > make pull requests to fix some things. > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Stephen Mallette < > spmalle...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > The download page is now "live" > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > spmalle...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I assume everyone is cool with making the Download Page live at this > > > point > > > >> as there's been no other feedback in the last few days. I'll > probably > > > make > > > >> some adjustments to the web site tomorrow to bring it online > publicly. > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Stephen Mallette < > > spmalle...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> I updated the downloads page some more: > > > >>> > > > >>> + tweaked the date format a bit to "really" match the rest of the > > site > > > >>> (which is still inconsistent in other places like changelog - dah) > > > >>> + added a "verifying downloads" section which talks about > > GPG/PGP/etc. > > > >>> > > > >>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/downloads.html > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > > spmalle...@gmail.com> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Good feedback Robert/Jason. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Updated: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/downloads.html > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Added documentation and included some descriptors to current > > releases. > > > >>>> Didn't change the date format for now - that's the format we use > > > everywhere > > > >>>> around "release" so didn't want to muck with that at this point. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Robert Dale <robd...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Stephen, I think what Sebb might be getting at is that some > things > > > >>>>> should be spelled out even if they are obvious to some. I agree > > with > > > >>>>> this. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> 3.2.1 (latest, stable) > > > >>>>> 3.1.3 (bug fixes only) > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I think the dates should be in ISO8601 format. YYYY-MM-DD > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Otherwise, I think it looks very good. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> Robert Dale > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Jason Plurad <plur...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > +1 looks great. > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > Link to the documentation, maybe next to the release notes > link, > > > >>>>> would be > > > >>>>> > useful too. > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > -- Jason > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > > >>>>> spmalle...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>> > wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> >> I think it might be a good idea to include a "Download Page" > on > > > our > > > >>>>> web > > > >>>>> >> site. It would let us better list the versions we have out > there > > > and > > > >>>>> would > > > >>>>> >> get us better in line with Apache Infrastructure - for > example: > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1255 > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> I'm also seeing that we yet have spots where we dont' link to > > the > > > >>>>> mirror > > > >>>>> >> system. And finally, it would be nice to have a "generic" > > download > > > >>>>> page > > > >>>>> >> where we could point external links to - like the new > > > "documentation" > > > >>>>> >> feature in StackOverflow (right now it's sorta hardcoded to > the > > > >>>>> mirror > > > >>>>> >> which isn't so good because we'll have to change that all the > > > time). > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> I quickly took a swipe at such a page: > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/downloads.html > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> It is NOT "linked to" by anything at this point so it is > > > "hidden". I > > > >>>>> just > > > >>>>> >> wanted to have something that everyone could look at to get > the > > > idea > > > >>>>> of > > > >>>>> >> what such a page might look like. > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> Thoughts? > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> Thanks, > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> Stephen > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Robert Dale > > > > > >
