Yeah - i'm not so good with the sed to the awk to the grep or whatever so if it can be that simple that would be awesome. The groovy template engine might be another option. Something like that would work easy enough too I would guess. I really don't think we need much more than that right now.
Organizationally, I think we should have a /site directory at the root of the repo to house the images/html template content and then have it generate into root /target/site from bin/generate-site.sh. On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Dylan Millikin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm sounds like what we would want would be a template engine that would > help us build the static site. > If all we need are includes that put together html partials > (headers/footers) we could make our own. It could be as simple as using sed > in bin/generate-web-site.sh > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > yes - static html/css and it sucks a bit because we don't have any re-use > > going on there. so if we have to change a menu or something it means > > changing it on every page in the site. would be nice to have some > re-usable > > headers/footers and such. i looked into some static site generators a > while > > back, but they all seemed like they did too much. maybe i didn't know > what > > to look for. > > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Dylan Millikin <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > How is the current site structured? Is it just HTML and CSS files? > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > no - we don't have one for the main web site. i've wanted to suggest > > that > > > > we change that though and generate the main web site from the github > > > repo. > > > > in that way we could easily accept pull requests and such. i don't > > think > > > we > > > > want to take a full asciidoc approach and the web site generation > would > > > > probably stay separate from the doc generation, but it would be nice > if > > > we > > > > could bin/generate-web-site.sh for a local build of that that thing > > which > > > > could then be published to the apache svn repo. anyone else like that > > > idea? > > > > if so, how would it best be done? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Robert Dale <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Is there a git repo for this and the main website? I would like to > > > > > make pull requests to fix some things. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > The download page is now "live" > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> I assume everyone is cool with making the Download Page live at > > this > > > > > point > > > > > >> as there's been no other feedback in the last few days. I'll > > > probably > > > > > make > > > > > >> some adjustments to the web site tomorrow to bring it online > > > publicly. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Stephen Mallette < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> I updated the downloads page some more: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> + tweaked the date format a bit to "really" match the rest of > the > > > > site > > > > > >>> (which is still inconsistent in other places like changelog - > > dah) > > > > > >>> + added a "verifying downloads" section which talks about > > > > GPG/PGP/etc. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/downloads.html > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> Good feedback Robert/Jason. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Updated: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/downloads.html > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Added documentation and included some descriptors to current > > > > releases. > > > > > >>>> Didn't change the date format for now - that's the format we > use > > > > > everywhere > > > > > >>>> around "release" so didn't want to muck with that at this > point. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Robert Dale < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> Stephen, I think what Sebb might be getting at is that some > > > things > > > > > >>>>> should be spelled out even if they are obvious to some. I > agree > > > > with > > > > > >>>>> this. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> 3.2.1 (latest, stable) > > > > > >>>>> 3.1.3 (bug fixes only) > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> I think the dates should be in ISO8601 format. YYYY-MM-DD > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Otherwise, I think it looks very good. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > > >>>>> Robert Dale > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Jason Plurad < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>> > +1 looks great. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > Link to the documentation, maybe next to the release notes > > > link, > > > > > >>>>> would be > > > > > >>>>> > useful too. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > -- Jason > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > > > > >>>>> [email protected]> > > > > > >>>>> > wrote: > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> >> I think it might be a good idea to include a "Download > Page" > > > on > > > > > our > > > > > >>>>> web > > > > > >>>>> >> site. It would let us better list the versions we have out > > > there > > > > > and > > > > > >>>>> would > > > > > >>>>> >> get us better in line with Apache Infrastructure - for > > > example: > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1255 > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> I'm also seeing that we yet have spots where we dont' link > > to > > > > the > > > > > >>>>> mirror > > > > > >>>>> >> system. And finally, it would be nice to have a "generic" > > > > download > > > > > >>>>> page > > > > > >>>>> >> where we could point external links to - like the new > > > > > "documentation" > > > > > >>>>> >> feature in StackOverflow (right now it's sorta hardcoded > to > > > the > > > > > >>>>> mirror > > > > > >>>>> >> which isn't so good because we'll have to change that all > > the > > > > > time). > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> I quickly took a swipe at such a page: > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/downloads.html > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> It is NOT "linked to" by anything at this point so it is > > > > > "hidden". I > > > > > >>>>> just > > > > > >>>>> >> wanted to have something that everyone could look at to > get > > > the > > > > > idea > > > > > >>>>> of > > > > > >>>>> >> what such a page might look like. > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> Thoughts? > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> Stephen > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Robert Dale > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
