On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 14:29 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > I'd prefer to move forward with just the truncation fix so that we can > move towards a release. > > Any other efforts can be postponed at this time. If the mark/reset bug > in fact exists, there is an easy work around, and that is to use > java.io.BufferedReader. > > whether the code is hopelessly broken or not, I don't have enough info > to comment on. But I do think the code is too fragile to be mucked with > in our 6.0.x branch, that can be done in trunk or sandbox. > > It's better for us to get a release out that takes care of the > regressions that are in the releases we have now.
This code has been used for a very long time. Where is the regression ? (actually, where is the bug ? feel free to post test cases to bug 44494) Personally, I am in no hurry to proceed with a release. Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
