Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 14:29 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'd prefer to move forward with just the truncation fix so that we can
move towards a release.
Any other efforts can be postponed at this time. If the mark/reset bug
in fact exists, there is an easy work around, and that is to use
java.io.BufferedReader.
whether the code is hopelessly broken or not, I don't have enough info
to comment on. But I do think the code is too fragile to be mucked with
in our 6.0.x branch, that can be done in trunk or sandbox.
It's better for us to get a release out that takes care of the
regressions that are in the releases we have now.
This code has been used for a very long time. Where is the regression ?
(actually, where is the bug ? feel free to post test cases to bug 44494)
regression, the fact that you can't read more than 8k when using
ServletRequest.getReader
Personally, I am in no hurry to proceed with a release.
the regression mentioned above, and providing backwards compatibility
with invalid v0 cookies IMO is enough to push another release
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
