On 02/09/2014 19:31, Henri Gomez wrote: > About git workflow. > > Github popularized fork/pull-request mode and it helped enrolled tons of > new developpers in many Git projects, in Github but not only. > Would it be something possible with current Git infra in ASF ?
The git repo would be mirrored at github. Folks can open pull requests at gitbuh now and we can close them when we commit the changes. That won't change if we switch to git. > Side note, did infra folks plans to use a new git hosting ? > Using Stash, Gitlab, Gitblit ? Or GitBucket (this implementation came from > an ASFer) ? No plans to change current arrangement. Mark > > > > 2014-09-02 18:41 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: > >> I've been looking at this again (anything to get a break from writing >> parsers for cookies) and chatting with some of the infra folks that look >> after the ASF's git repos. >> >> There are a couple of things we need to do: >> a) decide how we want to organise development in git >> b) decide if we want to move to git >> >> Now the decision we make for a) might influence some folks to make a >> different decision for b). On the other hand, there is no point debating >> a) if we are never going to move. >> >> So, how do folks want to approach this? >> A: Vote to move to git and then figure out how best to use it? or >> B: Agree our git workflows and then have a vote on moving to git with >> those workflows? >> >> I'm leaning towards A myself. >> >> Mark >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
