Le 29 mars 2018 20:49, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Mar 28, 2018, at 8:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mar 28, 2018, at 6:29 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is your -1 on the basis that the code must be moved to Geronimo? > > That + the fact tomee is not and shouldnt become a put it all project just > become of scm perms IMO but stay an integration project to keep sense and > not mess up its own image and mess up the quality of our reusable libs. Do you see this as a one-time situation or do you intend to vote the same way on any future MicroProfile implementation work in TomEE? For example, should work be started to implement MicroProfile OpenTracing in TomEE, would that PR be -1 on the basis the implementation should be in Geronimo? Being said it will be in G anyway since that is half of G definition since some months now (since server has been dropped), I ll do my best to keep it consistent in our small ecosystem and do the same to have strong reusable libs since there is no technical blockers @MP to have it and a strong integration solution (tomee) and not a mess with an in between state. -David
