Globally that is it. You explained a lot why geronimo failed and not sure
why tomee is kind of taking the same path - well actually cause of "perms
lack" fear from what I read. This is not a safe reason (+not that relevant
@asf thanks to the meritocracy) and Id prefer to keep "us" being unite as
we have been 7 years ago instead of just going on different paths cause of
a fears.



Le 29 mars 2018 21:57, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> On Mar 29, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Le 29 mars 2018 20:49, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>
>> On Mar 28, 2018, at 8:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 28, 2018, at 6:29 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> Is your -1 on the basis that the code must be moved to Geronimo?
>>
>> That + the fact tomee is not and shouldnt become a put it all project
just
>> become of scm perms IMO but stay an integration project to keep sense and
>> not mess up its own image and mess up the quality of our reusable libs.
>
> > Do you see this as a one-time situation or do you intend to vote the
same
> > way on any future MicroProfile implementation work in TomEE?
> >
> > For example, should work be started to implement MicroProfile
OpenTracing
> > in TomEE, would that PR be -1 on the basis the implementation should be
in
> > Geronimo?
>
> Being said it will be in G anyway since that is half of G definition since
> some months now (since server has been dropped), I ll do my best to keep
it
> consistent in our small ecosystem and do the same to have strong reusable
> libs since there is no technical blockers @MP to have it and a strong
> integration solution (tomee) and not a mess with an in between state.

I'm reading that as a yes that you would -1 future MP implementation work
in TomEE on the basis it should live in Geronimo, but you hope it doesn't
come to that and will do your best to create good implementations in
Geronimo so it isn't necessary.

If I misunderstood, please clarify.


-David

Reply via email to