> On Mar 29, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Le 29 mars 2018 20:49, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > >> On Mar 28, 2018, at 8:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >>> On Mar 28, 2018, at 6:29 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> Is your -1 on the basis that the code must be moved to Geronimo? >> >> That + the fact tomee is not and shouldnt become a put it all project just >> become of scm perms IMO but stay an integration project to keep sense and >> not mess up its own image and mess up the quality of our reusable libs. > > > Do you see this as a one-time situation or do you intend to vote the same > > way on any future MicroProfile implementation work in TomEE? > > > > For example, should work be started to implement MicroProfile OpenTracing > > in TomEE, would that PR be -1 on the basis the implementation should be in > > Geronimo? > > Being said it will be in G anyway since that is half of G definition since > some months now (since server has been dropped), I ll do my best to keep it > consistent in our small ecosystem and do the same to have strong reusable > libs since there is no technical blockers @MP to have it and a strong > integration solution (tomee) and not a mess with an in between state.
I'm reading that as a yes that you would -1 future MP implementation work in TomEE on the basis it should live in Geronimo, but you hope it doesn't come to that and will do your best to create good implementations in Geronimo so it isn't necessary. If I misunderstood, please clarify. -David
