Hi Justin,

sorry for the long time it took, but I finally had a look at the release
candidate.

Overall it looks good to me, I checked the signatures, built it and looked
at regulatory files.

I do have two questions on the NOTICE and LICENSE file though:

1. in NOTICE there is a sentence that mentions that this content was
originally developed by you. Is that legally required to be there? I
absolutely don't want to remove your name from the material as original
author, but when looking at the Apache docs for assembling a NOTICE file it
said to not put anything in there that is not legally required [1], which
got me wondering.

2. At the bottom of the License file, there is a section that this project
contains parts of the reveal.js framework which is licensed under the MIT
license. Should that not be in the Notice file? In the docs I found the
following two sentences, which have me confused :)
"LICENSE should contain the text of the ALv2 -- no more, no less."  [2]
"The LICENSE file communicates the licensing of all content in an Apache
product distribution. It always contains the text of the Apache License,
and sometimes more." [3]

Probably both nits/non-issues, but wanted to briefly clarify.

Best regards,
Sönke

[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
[2] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#simple
[3] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#overview-of-files

On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 19:07, Lars Francke <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Dmitriy,
>
> thanks for checking!
>
> The "your name" stuff came at my request.
> Justin had his personal details in there (e.g. Justin McLean, etc.) and in
> my opinion the material should be anonymous. Similar to code where we don't
> have any @author tags.
> So Justin removed the information. I'd be in favor of entirely removing
> those slides but I'm fine with the current solution as well.
>
> As to the other one: Just reading that sentence makes sense to me. I just
> looked at the slide and I think it's fine.
> Looking at the title of the slide "Why we have an incubating process" this
> one could begin with "To ensure" but I believe it's fine the way it is.
>
> The decision is yours but if that's everything you dislike I'd suggest we
> can fix/change it post-release.
>
> Cheers,
> Lars
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:44 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Justin, Training developers,
> >
> > +0.9 (PPMC Binding),
> > Checked license, notice readme and build from sources.
> >
> > I have only one remark. Generated slides in
> >
> >
> /apache-training-navigating-ASF-incubation-1.0-incubating/target/generated-slides/index.html
> > contain
> > The first slide contains:
> > ```Your Name
> > Your Job title
> > Your email```
> >
> > The second slide contains
> > ```Who am I?
> > TODO Fill in your own your info here```
> >
> > One from the next slide contains
> > ```Ensure that decision making is done in the open``` <- Phrase seems to
> be
> > incomplete.
> >
> > Sincerely
> > Dmitriy Pavlov
> >
> > пт, 7 июн. 2019 г. в 10:28, Justin Mclean <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks now we only need one more +1. Anyone?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > P.S I was hoping this talk was going to be accepted at ApacheCon but my
> > > other incubator talk got accepted instead. So looks like I have to work
> > on
> > > that and submit it here now ;-)
> >
>


-- 
Sönke Liebau
Partner
Tel. +49 179 7940878
OpenCore GmbH & Co. KG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 8 - 22880 Wedel - Germany

Reply via email to